"We're not going to stop until marriage between a man and a woman is protected," said Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan.
Last week, the U.S. Senate failed to pass a constitutional amendment that would have defined marriage as being a union only between a man and a woman. The vote was 49-48.
Such a charade. Most of the arguments in favor of this amendment were simply a cover for prejudice against people who have different sexual preferences. Or, based upon sentiments such as Brownback's, they represent an actual fear of gays.
I fail to see how my marriage is threatened by two men, or two women, living together in a loving relationship. What is Brownback protecting me from?
No comments:
Post a Comment